CVE-2025-67925
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in zozothemes Corpkit corpkit allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Corpkit: from n/a through <= 2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in Corpkit <= 2.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to manipulate filename parameters in include/require statements to read sensitive server files or potentially achieve remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Corpkit installationSearch for Corpkit PHP files in the web server document root. Common paths include /var/www/html/, /www/, or check for a 'corpkit' directory. Look for index.php or main entry point files.Affected if Corpkit PHP files are found on the server
-
Identify Corpkit versionCheck for a version file, README, or look for version strings in PHP source files (often in config files, footer, or version constants). Compare against 2.0 and earlier.Affected if Installed version is 2.0 or lower
-
Examine file inclusion codeSearch PHP source files for include, require, include_once, or require_once statements that use variables in the path (e.g., include($file), require($_GET['file'])). Look in the main application files.Affected if Code contains include/require statements with user-supplied filename parameters
-
Verify application accessibilityConfirm the Corpkit application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS without requiring authentication. Test accessing the main login or entry point.Affected if Application is reachable without authentication
-
Check vulnerable parameter exposureIdentify if the filename parameter used in include/require can be controlled via URL parameters (GET/POST). Review the application's routing or entry points.Affected if URL parameters can control the filename passed to include/require
If Corpkit version 2.0 or lower is installed and the application exposes file inclusion parameters without proper validation, the server is vulnerable to LFI attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based input validation on file inclusion parameters, sanitize or completely remove user-supplied input from include/require statements, and disable allow_url_include to prevent remote file inclusion.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67925 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data