CVE-2025-67926
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Shahjahan Jewel Fluent Support fluent-support allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Fluent Support: from n/a through <= 1.10.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization in Fluent Support plugin allows users to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, likely enabling unauthorized access to support ticket data or administrative functions that should be restricted to privileged users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Fluent Support plugin is installedCheck WordPress plugins directory for fluent-support folder, or run: wp plugin list --search='fluent-support'Affected if Plugin is not installed means not affected by this CVE
-
Identify installed plugin versionRead plugin header from fluent-support/fluent-support.php or run: wp plugin get fluent-support --field=versionAffected if Version is within an affected range (compare to official vulnerability disclosure)
-
Verify role-based access control configurationReview user roles and capabilities in WordPress admin under Users > Roles, or inspect plugin capability definitions in codeAffected if Users with low privileges (like Subscriber or Customer) have unexpected administrative capabilities
-
Test for unauthorized access to support ticket dataLog in as a low-privilege user and attempt to access support ticket endpoints or view tickets belonging to other usersAffected if Low-privilege user can view, modify, or delete tickets they should not have access to
-
Check for unprotected admin AJAX endpointsInspect plugin AJAX handlers (admin-ajax.php calls) and check if they verify user capabilities before performing actionsAffected if AJAX actions lack capability checks and execute sensitive operations for unauthenticated or low-privilege users
User is affected if Fluent Support plugin is installed and permits unauthorized access to support ticket data or administrative functions due to missing or improper authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper capability checks and permission verification on all sensitive actions and endpoints within the plugin to enforce role-based access controls.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67926 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67926 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data