CVE-2025-68019
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in cleverplugins SEO Booster seo-booster allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects SEO Booster: from n/a through <= 6.1.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe SEO Booster WordPress plugin versions 6.1.8 and below contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. This likely enables unauthenticated or insufficiently authorized users to access certain plugin functions that should be restricted to privileged users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SEO Booster plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'SEO Booster' by cleverplugins, or inspect the plugin directory /wp-content/plugins/seo-booster/ for existenceAffected if SEO Booster plugin is installed on the WordPress site
-
Check installed version numberIn WordPress admin Plugins page, click on the plugin to view details and find the version number, or read the main plugin file header in /wp-content/plugins/seo-booster/ that contains 'Version:'Affected if The version number is 6.1.8 or lower (any version at or below 6.1.8 is affected)
-
Identify publicly accessible plugin endpointsReview WordPress site's public URLs for any ajax, rest-api, or direct PHP endpoints under /wp-content/plugins/seo-booster/ that may handle sensitive operationsAffected if Plugin functions or AJAX handlers are accessible to unauthenticated users or users without administrator privileges
A site is affected if it has SEO Booster plugin version 6.1.8 or below installed and has exposed plugin functions accessible to unauthorized users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the latest security patch from cleverplugins and ensure all plugin updates are applied promptly. Restrict administrative access to trusted personnel until the patch is applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68019 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68019 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data