Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-68026

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Niaj Morshed LC Wizard ghl-wizard allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects LC Wizard: from n/a through <= 2.1.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization vulnerability in LC Wizard allows users to access functionality beyond their assigned security level due to incorrectly configured access control. The plugin fails to properly validate user permissions before executing certain actions, enabling privilege escalation or unauthorized access to sensitive features.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks (not just authentication) at every function/endpoint that requires specific user roles or capabilities. Audit all existing access control configurations and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) consistently throughout the plugin.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if LC Wizard is installed
    Locate the LC Wizard plugin files in the plugin directory (e.g., wp-content/plugins/ for WordPress, or the application's plugin folder). Check for presence of lc-wizard folder or files with 'LC Wizard' or 'lc_wizard' naming.
    Affected if The plugin is present and active in the environment
  2. Check the installed LC Wizard version
    Examine the plugin's main file header (e.g., readme.txt, plugin.php, or composer.json) for the version number. Compare against any version history or release notes if available.
    Affected if The version cannot be determined or is from a timeframe before authorization fixes were implemented
  3. Inspect access control configuration
    Review the plugin's configuration files or admin settings for role-based access control (RBAC) definitions. Look for any custom roles, capability mappings, or permission settings that define what each user level can access.
    Affected if No explicit authorization checks are defined, or configuration allows any authenticated user to access admin functions
  4. Test authorization enforcement on sensitive endpoints
    Using a low-privilege user account (e.g., subscriber or guest), attempt to access plugin admin functions, settings pages, or API endpoints that should require elevated privileges. Capture HTTP responses and verify if access is denied or granted.
    Affected if Requests from low-privilege users succeed where they should be rejected with 403/401 errors
  5. Review code for permission validation
    If source code is accessible, search for function calls that validate user capabilities (e.g., current_user_can, check_admin_referer, wp_verify_nonce) before executing sensitive actions. Note if any admin functions lack such checks.
    Affected if Sensitive functions execute without prior capability or permission verification

The environment is affected if LC Wizard is installed and low-privilege users can access features or functions that should require higher-level permissions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks (not just authentication) at every function/endpoint that requires specific user roles or capabilities. Audit all existing access control configurations and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) consistently throughout the plugin.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,530
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68026 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68026 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data