CVE-2025-68030
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Messiah Frontis Blocks frontis-blocks allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Frontis Blocks: from n/a through <= 1.1.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Frontis Blocks WordPress plugin allows remote attackers to make the server perform arbitrary requests to internal or external resources. The vulnerability exists in versions up to and including 1.1.5, likely due to insufficient validation of user-controlled input used in server-side requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Frontis Blocks plugin versionLog into WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > Frontis Blocks and view the version number. Alternatively, inspect the plugin's main PHP file (e.g., /wp-content/plugins/frontis-blocks/frontis-blocks.php) for the 'Version' header comment, or run: wp plugin list --name='frontis-blocks'Affected if The installed version is 1.1.5 or any version up to and including 1.1.5
-
Identify if Frontis Blocks exposes URL/request functionalityNavigate to the Frontis Blocks settings page in WordPress admin (usually under Settings or a dedicated Frontis menu). Look for any fields, modules, or blocks that accept URL input, allow fetching external resources, or configure server-side requests.Affected if Any such URL/request feature is present and accessible to users (even low-privilege users)
-
Review plugin files for request-making codeInspect the plugin directory contents (via FTP, file manager, or WP-CLI: wp eval 'echo plugin_dir_path("frontis-blocks");'). Look for PHP files containing functions like wp_remote_get, wp_remote_post, curl_exec, file_get_contents with URL variables, or similar HTTP request functions that process user input.Affected if Such request-handling code exists and appears to accept unsanitized user input for URLs
You are affected if Frontis Blocks plugin version is 1.1.5 or lower AND any feature allowing user-supplied URLs to trigger server-side requests is enabled or accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Frontis Blocks plugin to the latest version if a patched release is available. If no patch exists, disable the plugin until a fix is released. Additionally, restrict server network egress to prevent the plugin from reaching sensitive internal resources.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68030 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data