CVE-2025-68052
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Eagle Booking <= 1.3.4.3 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Eagle Booking versions 1.3.4.3 and below, allowing attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions on the booking platform without their consent.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Eagle Booking installationCheck your web server for Eagle Booking files (typically in the web root directory, look for booking-related PHP files or the eagle-booking folder structure)Affected if Eagle Booking software is present on the server
-
Identify installed versionCheck the version file or header in the Eagle Booking installation (commonly found in a version.php, config file, or admin dashboard about page)Affected if The installed version is 1.3.4.3 or lower
-
Locate state-changing formsIdentify forms that perform actions like bookings, user registration, or admin changes (search for HTML form elements in booking, reservation, or user management pages)Affected if Forms handling bookings or user data exist in the application
-
Inspect for anti-CSRF tokensView the HTML source of state-changing forms and check if they contain anti-CSRF token fields (look for hidden input fields with names like token, csrf, nonce, or _token)Affected if State-changing forms lack anti-CSRF token fields in their HTML
-
Verify Origin/Referer header validationCheck server-side code or HTTP response headers to determine if the application validates the Origin or Referer headers on form submissionsAffected if The application does not validate Origin or Referer headers on form submissions
You are affected if Eagle Booking version 1.3.4.3 or below is installed AND state-changing forms lack anti-CSRF token protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent forged requests from malicious sites.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68052 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68052 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data