Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-68069

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in wpWax Directorist directorist allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Directorist: from n/a through <= 8.6.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization in wpWax Directorist plugin allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The vulnerability enables unauthorized access to certain functionalities or data due to missing capability checks or permission validations. This broken access control issue has a CVSS 7.1 indicating significant impact on confidentiality and integrity.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks (capability checks, nonce verification, role-based access control) on all sensitive endpoints and functionalities within the Directorist plugin. Update to the patched version once available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Directorist plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Directorist' or check via wp-cli: wp plugin list --name='directorist'
    Affected if The Directorist plugin is present and active on the WordPress site
  2. Identify installed Directorist version
    Check the plugin version in the plugin header (wp-content/plugins/directorist/readme.txt or composer.json) or via wp-cli: wp plugin get directorist --field=version
    Affected if The installed version is unknown or unpatched (no specific vulnerable version range was provided, so compare to any available patched release)
  3. Verify plugin is publicly accessible
    Test if Directorist AJAX endpoints or admin pages are reachable without authentication: curl -s https://SITE/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=directorist_[endpoint]
    Affected if The endpoint returns data or executes without requiring login or capability verification
  4. Check for privilege escalation paths
    Submit requests as a low-privileged or logged-out user to Directorist endpoints that should require admin capabilities (e.g., settings, data export, user management endpoints)
    Affected if The system allows access or returns sensitive data without proper capability checks (manage_options, edit_users, etc.)

A user is affected if the Directorist plugin is installed and its endpoints/settings are accessible without proper authorization checks or capability verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks (capability checks, nonce verification, role-based access control) on all sensitive endpoints and functionalities within the Directorist plugin. Update to the patched version once available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68069 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68069 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data