Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-68087

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in merkulove Modalier for Elementor modalier-elementor allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Modalier for Elementor: from n/a through <= 1.0.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization vulnerability in the Modalier for Elementor plugin allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The plugin fails to properly validate user permissions before allowing access to certain functionality or data, potentially enabling unauthorized actions.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks and validate user permissions before executing privileged operations. Update to a patched version if available or configure appropriate access control settings.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Modalier for Elementor plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins or inspect the wp-content/plugins directory for a folder named 'modalier-for-elementor' or similar
    Affected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
  2. Identify the installed plugin version
    Check the plugin main file header (e.g., modalier-for-elementor.php) for the 'Version' comment, or view the plugin details in WordPress admin Plugins page
    Affected if Unable to determine version or version cannot be compared to patched releases
  3. Review access control settings for Modalier functionality
    Inspect plugin settings pages in WordPress admin under Elementor or Modalier settings areas. Look for access control, capability, or permission-related options
    Affected if No capability checks are configured or any authenticated user can access privileged features
  4. Test if unauthenticated or low-privilege users can access Modalier endpoints
    Use a tool like curl or Burp to send requests to Modalier AJAX endpoints or admin-ajax.php actions without proper authentication tokens, checking if privileged operations execute
    Affected if Requests execute successfully without returning authorization errors or 403 responses
  5. Audit user roles with access to Modalier features
    In WordPress admin > Users > Roles, or using a role management plugin, examine which roles have capabilities related to Modalier or Elementor editing
    Affected if Subscriber, Contributor, or other low-privilege roles have elevated capabilities they should not possess

If the Modalier for Elementor plugin is installed and its functionality is accessible to users lacking proper WordPress capabilities, the environment is likely affected by this missing authorization vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks and validate user permissions before executing privileged operations. Update to a patched version if available or configure appropriate access control settings.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68087 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68087 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data