CVE-2025-68389
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAllocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceKibana fails to properly limit or throttle resource allocation when processing certain HTTP requests, allowing authenticated users to craft requests that cause excessive CPU, memory, or other computing resource consumption, ultimately crashing the Kibana process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, <= 7.17.29>= 8.0.0, < 8.19.9>= 9.0.0, < 9.1.9>= 9.2.0, < 9.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Kibana versionRun 'kibana --version' from the Kibana installation directory, or check the version field in the package.json file located in the Kibana installation root, or look for the version in the initial startup logsAffected if The installed version falls within >= 7.0.0 to <= 7.17.29, OR >= 8.0.0 to < 8.19.9, OR >= 9.0.0 to < 9.1.9, OR >= 9.2.0 to < 9.2.3
-
Verify authentication is enabledInspect the kibana.yml configuration file for authentication-related settings such as xpack.security.enabled, opensearch.security.auth.enabled, or other authentication provider configurationsAffected if Authentication is enabled and the Kibana version is in the affected ranges listed above - the CVE requires authenticated users to exploit the flaw
-
Review Kibana for rate limiting configurationCheck kibana.yml for any existing rate limiting or request throttling settings, and review any reverse proxy or load balancer configurations in front of Kibana for rate limit rulesAffected if No rate limiting is configured and the version is vulnerable - absence of throttling means the environment lacks defense-in-depth controls
-
Inspect logs for resource exhaustion indicatorsReview Kibana server logs for patterns of excessive CPU or memory usage, process restarts, or out-of-memory errors that correlate with specific authenticated user requestsAffected if Logs show Kibana crashes or high resource consumption triggered by authenticated user requests without corresponding rate limit blocks
The environment is affected if Kibana is running a version within the specified vulnerable ranges and has authentication enabled, since the flaw requires authenticated users to send crafted requests that exhaust resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.19.99.1.99.2.3
Apply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a patched Kibana version. Additionally, consider implementing rate limiting at the proxy/load balancer level as a defense-in-depth measure while the patch is being applied.
Kibana 7.17.30, 8.19.9+, 9.1.9+, or 9.2.3+ (depending on your current major version)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Kibana version using 'kibana --version' or checking the kibana.yml configuration
- 2. For Kibana 7.x (7.0.0 to 7.17.29): Upgrade to version 7.17.30 or later
- 3. For Kibana 8.x (8.0.0 to 8.19.8): Upgrade to version 8.19.9 or later
- 4. For Kibana 9.0.x (9.0.0 to 9.1.8): Upgrade to version 9.1.9 or later
- 5. For Kibana 9.2.x (9.2.0 to 9.2.2): Upgrade to version 9.2.3 or later
- 6. Backup Kibana configuration files (kibana.yml) and any custom dashboards/reports before upgrading
- 7. Stop the Kibana service
- 8. Install the upgraded Kibana package using your package manager (e.g., apt, yum, or archive)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68389 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data