CVE-2025-68570
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in captivateaudio Captivate Sync captivatesync-trade allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Captivate Sync: from n/a through <= 3.2.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in Captivate Sync versions through 3.2.2 where unsanitized user input is passed to SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands and extract data from the database by observing application behavior differences.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Captivate Sync versionLocate the installed Captivate Sync application and check its version number (typically in the application metadata, about dialog, or version file within the installation directory)Affected if The installed version is 3.2.2 or any earlier version
-
Verify application accepts user inputReview the application to identify where user-provided data enters the system, such as login forms, search fields, settings inputs, or API parametersAffected if The application accepts user input that could be passed to database queries
-
Inspect database query implementationExamine the source code or configuration files that handle database interactions, looking for SQL query construction that incorporates user-supplied values directly into query stringsAffected if User input is concatenated or inserted directly into SQL query strings without sanitization or parameterized queries
-
Confirm SQL injection entry pointsTest or review input fields to determine if user-provided values reach database query logic without proper escaping or prepared statementsAffected if User-controllable parameters are used in SQL queries without binding parameters or escaping special characters
-
Check database user privilegesReview the database credentials used by Captivate Sync to determine if the application database user has broader permissions than necessaryAffected if The database user has permissions beyond what the application requires, allowing extracted data to be accessed
You are affected if Captivate Sync version 3.2.2 or earlier is running and user input is passed directly to SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version if available; otherwise, implement parameterized queries/prepared statements and proper input validation across all database interactions.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68570 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68570 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data