CVE-2025-68604
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 2.5.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCSRF vulnerability in WPGraphQL allows attackers to induce authenticated users to execute unwanted GraphQL mutations. The lack of proper CSRF tokens or origin validation enables cross-site request forgery attacks against logged-in WordPress users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WPGraphQL plugin is installedCheck for the WPGraphQL plugin in wp-content/plugins/ directory, or look for the GraphQL endpoint at yoursite.com/graphql/Affected if WPGraphQL plugin is active and the /graphql/ endpoint is accessible
-
Identify installed WPGraphQL versionOpen wp-content/plugins/wp-graphql/readme.txt and find the version in the header, or check the plugin main file for 'Version:' commentAffected if Version is lower than the patched version (check WPGraphQL changelog for the security fix release)
-
Verify GraphQL mutations are executableSend a POST request to /graphql/ with a test mutation (e.g., {__typename}) without any CSRF token or nonceAffected if The endpoint accepts and processes mutations without requiring anti-CSRF tokens in the request headers or body
-
Check authentication cookie attributesInspect Set-Cookie headers for the WordPress session cookie; verify if SameSite attribute is set to 'Lax' or 'Strict'Affected if Authentication cookies lack SameSite attribute or are set to 'None' without secure flag
-
Inspect WordPress CSRF protection configurationCheck if wp-config.php has DISALLOW_FILE_MODPS or if the site validates Origin/Referer headers for GraphQL API requestsAffected if No Origin/Referer header validation is performed for GraphQL endpoint requests
If WPGraphQL is installed and its /graphql/ endpoint accepts mutations without requiring CSRF tokens or validating request origins, the site is vulnerable to CVE-2025-68604.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF token validation for GraphQL mutations and verify Origin/Referer headers. Apply SameSite attribute to authentication cookies.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68604 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68604 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data