CVE-2025-68668
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedn8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA sandbox bypass vulnerability in n8n's Python Code Node using Pyodide allows authenticated users with workflow creation/modification permissions to execute arbitrary commands on the host system with the same privileges as the n8n process. The vulnerability stems from insufficient isolation in the Pyodide-based sandbox implementation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.0.0, < 2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify n8n versionRun 'n8n --version' or check the version in package.json, or inspect the running container/image tagAffected if Version is 1.x (greater than or equal to 1.0.0 but less than 2.0.0)
-
Verify Python Code Node is not excludedCheck if the Code node is excluded by inspecting environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE (should contain 'n8n-nodes-base.code' if disabled) or check active nodes in n8n UIAffected if NODES_EXCLUDE is not set or does not contain the Code node, meaning the node is available
-
Confirm Python support is enabledCheck environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED; if not set, Python is enabled by default in affected versionsAffected if N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED is not set to 'false' or is absent, enabling Pyodide Python execution
-
Verify task runner sandboxing is not configuredCheck if N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables are set; absence means the older Pyodide sandbox is in useAffected if Neither N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED nor N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER is configured, leaving the vulnerable Pyodide sandbox active
-
Confirm user access to workflow creation/modificationReview user roles and permissions in n8n to determine if any users have workflow create or edit rightsAffected if Users exist with workflow creation or modification permissions, allowing access to the Code node
You are affected if running n8n version 1.x, the Code node is available, Python support is enabled (not disabled), and users with workflow edit permissions can access the Python Code node with the default Pyodide sandbox.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.0.0
Upgrade to n8n version 2.0.0 or higher, or apply workarounds by setting NODES_EXCLUDE to disable the Code Node, N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false to disable Python support, or configure N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER for task runner-based sandboxing.
n8n version 2.0.0
- 1. Back up your existing n8n installation, workflows, and database before upgrading
- 2. Stop the n8n service
- 3. Upgrade n8n to version 2.0.0 using your deployment method (e.g., Docker: docker pull n8nio/n8n:v2.0.0, npm: npm install -g [email protected], or your container orchestration tool)
- 4. Start the n8n service
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the n8n version in the UI or CLI
- 6. Test that workflows with Python Code nodes function correctly in the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68668 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68668 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data