CVE-2025-68853
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Kleor Contact Manager contact-manager allows Object Injection.This issue affects Contact Manager: from n/a through <= 9.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA PHP Object Injection vulnerability exists in Kleor Contact Manager due to unsafe deserialization of untrusted data. Attackers can potentially exploit this to execute arbitrary code by injecting malicious PHP objects, especially if magic methods exist in the application or installed plugins/themes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Kleor Contact Manager installationSearch your web server file system for the Kleor Contact Manager plugin or module directoryAffected if The Kleor Contact Manager software is present in your environment
-
Locate PHP files using unserialize()Search the Kleor PHP source files for calls to the unserialize() function, particularly those processing data from $_GET, $_POST, $_COOKIE, or database query resultsAffected if unserialize() calls exist in the codebase without prior validation
-
Identify magic method definitionsSearch the PHP files for magic method definitions such as __wakeup, __destruct, __toString, __get, __set, or __call that could be leveraged in a POP chainAffected if Dangerous magic methods exist in the application or its installed plugins/themes
-
Check if external input reaches unserialize()Trace the data flow from user-supplied sources (request parameters, uploaded files, database fields) to the unserialize() calls identifiedAffected if Untrusted or unsanitized external data is passed directly to unserialize()
Your environment is affected if Kleor Contact Manager is installed AND contains unserialize() calls that process untrusted input, especially when dangerous magic methods are present in the codebase that could enable code execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace all unserialize() calls with safer alternatives like JSON encoding, implement strict input validation, and ensure no dangerous magic methods or pop chains exist in the codebase.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-68853 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-68853 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data