Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2025-69029

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Select-Themes Struktur struktur allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Struktur: from n/a through <= 2.5.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An authorization bypass vulnerability in the Struktur theme allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels through user-controlled keys, potentially enabling unauthorized access to resources or functionality.

MitigationReview and implement proper authorization checks for all user-controlled parameters; ensure access control decisions cannot be influenced by user-modifiable keys or identifiers.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Struktur theme installation
    Locate the theme files in your application's theme directory (commonly at themes/Struktur, wp-content/themes/Struktur, or similar paths depending on your CMS/framework). Confirm the theme is active or loaded in your application.
    Affected if The Struktur theme is installed and active in your environment
  2. Locate access control configuration files
    Search for configuration files related to access control, security levels, or permissions within the Struktur theme directory. Look for files named config, settings, permissions, roles, or access.json/php/yaml/ini.
    Affected if Access control is managed through user-modifiable configuration files within the theme
  3. Identify user-controlled key usage in authorization logic
    Search theme source files for code that uses request parameters, query strings, headers, or cookies as keys to determine user access. Look for patterns like $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST, or similar user input being passed to authorization checks.
    Affected if Authorization decisions rely on parameters that users can modify (keys, IDs, tokens from client input)
  4. Review security level configuration
    Examine how security levels or access tiers are defined in the theme. Check if these levels can be overridden or influenced through URL parameters, user profiles, or API inputs.
    Affected if Security levels are defined in a way that can be influenced or bypassed via user-controlled input
  5. Test for authorization bypass via manipulated keys
    If possible, attempt to access protected resources by modifying key values in requests (such as user_id, role_id, access_key parameters) and observe if access is granted when it should be denied.
    Affected if Modifying user-controllable key values in requests allows access to resources or functions outside the user's intended permission scope

Your environment is affected if the Struktur theme is installed and its authorization logic relies on user-modifiable keys or parameters to determine access control decisions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review and implement proper authorization checks for all user-controlled parameters; ensure access control decisions cannot be influenced by user-modifiable keys or identifiers.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69029 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69029 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data