CVE-2025-69086
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in jwsthemes Issabella issabella allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Issabella: from n/a through <= 1.1.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe jwsthemes Issabella theme (versions through 1.1.2) contains a PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability where user-supplied input is improperly used in include/require statements without sufficient validation, allowing attackers to read sensitive local files on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if the Issabella theme is installedLocate the theme files in your web application's theme directory (commonly wp-content/themes/issabella for WordPress, or the application's themes/issabella folder). Confirm the theme folder exists and contains the theme's core PHP files.Affected if The Issabella theme folder is present in the application.
-
Determine the installed version of the Issabella themeOpen the theme's style.css file (usually found in the theme root directory) and locate the 'Version:' header in the CSS comment block at the top. Alternatively, check for a version.php, info.json, or theme.json file that may contain version metadata.Affected if The version is 1.1.2 or any earlier version (1.0.0 through 1.1.2).
-
Identify PHP files using include or require with variable inputSearch the theme's PHP files for patterns like include($_GET[...]), require($_POST[...]), include_once($_REQUEST[...]), or similar constructs where user-supplied input (GET, POST, REQUEST, COOKIE) flows directly into file inclusion functions without passing through sanitization functions.Affected if Any PHP file in the theme contains include/require statements that directly use unfiltered user input parameters.
-
Locate the specific vulnerable parameterExamine the identified include/require calls to determine which URL parameter controls the file inclusion (common parameter names include 'page', 'file', 'template', 'load', 'path', 'theme', or custom parameters). Verify whether the parameter value is used without basename(), realpath(), or whitelist validation.Affected if A URL parameter directly influences the file path in an include/require statement without validation.
-
Test for LFI by injecting a benign pathIf the vulnerable parameter is identified, attempt a controlled test by submitting a value such as '../config.php' or '/etc/passwd' (if safe to do so in your environment) via the vulnerable parameter in a request and observe whether the application attempts to include the specified file.Affected if The application processes the path and returns content from the specified file, confirming the LFI is exploitable.
You are affected if the Issabella theme version is 1.1.2 or earlier and any PHP file in the theme uses include/require with unsanitized user input from request parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict whitelist-based input validation on all file inclusion parameters, use basename() and realpath() to sanitize paths, and avoid using user input directly in include/require statements.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69086 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69086 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data