CVE-2025-69094
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSubscriber SQL Injection in Unicamp <= 2.2.2 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the Unicamp WordPress plugin affecting versions 2.2.2 and below. The flaw allows authenticated users with Subscriber-level permissions to inject malicious SQL queries through unsanitized input parameters, potentially leading to data exfiltration or database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Unicamp plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for Unicamp plugin, or inspect the file /wp-content/plugins/unicamp/ for presenceAffected if Unicamp plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
-
Check installed Unicamp versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins > Installed Plugins, find Unicamp and note the version number displayed, or read the version from /wp-content/plugins/unicamp/readme.txt or unicamp.php headerAffected if Version is 2.2.2 or lower
-
Verify WordPress user registration is enabledGo to WordPress admin > Settings > General > Membership and check if Anyone can register is checkedAffected if User registration is enabled, allowing potential attacker to create a Subscriber account
-
Confirm Subscriber role exists and is activeGo to WordPress admin > Users > Roles and Permissions, or check if any user has Subscriber role assignedAffected if Subscriber role is available and users with this role can log in
You are affected if Unicamp plugin is installed with version 2.2.2 or lower AND user registration is enabled, allowing unauthenticated or any user to obtain Subscriber-level access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Unicamp plugin to the latest version. If no patch is available, disable the plugin until a fix is released. Audit user roles and permissions as a temporary measure.
Latest version of Unicamp (version higher than 2.2.2)
- Identify the current version of Unicamp theme or plugin installed on the site
- Check the official theme/plugin repository or vendor website for the latest available version
- Upgrade Unicamp to the latest version available, which should be higher than 2.2.2
- After upgrading, verify the SQL injection vulnerability is resolved by testing the subscriber functionality with parameterized queries or using a web application scanner
- Ensure all other WordPress core, themes, and plugins are also updated to their latest secure versions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69094 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69094 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data