CVE-2025-69113
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion in Nexio <= 1.10.0 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in Nexio version 1.10.0 and below allows remote attackers to read sensitive files on the server filesystem without any authentication credentials, potentially exposing configuration files, credentials, or other sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nexio installation versionLocate and inspect the Nexio application installation directory. Look for version information in configuration files, about pages, or the main application binary. Common locations include version.txt, about/info, or the main executable metadata.Affected if The installed version is 1.10.0 or any version below 1.10.0 (e.g., 1.9.x, 1.8.x, etc.)
-
Locate file inclusion endpointsReview the application's URL structure and parameters. Look for patterns commonly associated with file inclusion such as: file=, page=, path=, include=, template=, or similar parameters in HTTP requests.Affected if The application exposes any file inclusion parameter that accepts user-supplied input without server-side validation.
-
Verify lack of authentication requirementAttempt to access identified file inclusion endpoints without providing any authentication credentials or session tokens. Observe whether the application processes the request or returns an authentication error.Affected if File inclusion endpoints are accessible and process requests without requiring any authentication.
-
Test for directory traversal capabilitySend a crafted request to the file inclusion parameter using directory traversal sequences such as ../../../../etc/passwd or similar paths, observing whether the application returns file contents outside the intended directory.Affected if The application returns contents of files outside the intended web root directory when traversal sequences are used in the parameter.
A user is affected if they are running Nexio version 1.10.0 or below AND the application exposes an unauthenticated file inclusion parameter that permits directory traversal to read arbitrary files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Nexio if available, or implement strict input validation and path sanitization on file inclusion parameters to prevent directory traversal attacks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69113 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69113 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data