CVE-2025-69118
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion in CopyPress <= 1.4.5 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion vulnerability in CopyPress WordPress plugin versions 1.4.5 and below allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the server without any authentication. The LFI flaw enables traversal attacks (e.g., ../../etc/passwd) to access sensitive system files, configuration files, and potentially credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify CopyPress plugin installationCheck the wp-content/plugins/ directory for the copypress folder, or query the WordPress database wp_options table for option_name='active_plugins'Affected if CopyPress plugin folder exists in the plugins directory or is listed in active_plugins
-
Determine installed CopyPress versionOpen copypress.php in the plugin directory and read the 'Version' header comment, or check the WordPress plugins admin pageAffected if Version is 1.4.5 or lower, or version cannot be determined (assume affected)
-
Identify vulnerable LFI endpointReview plugin source code for file inclusion functions (include, require, file_get_contents) handling user-supplied parameters without sanitization, or scan HTTP routes for parameters that accept file pathsAffected if Plugin contains file operations using unsanitized request parameters (e.g., file, path, template, include)
-
Confirm unauthenticated access is possibleTest the identified endpoint without providing authentication cookies or credentialsAffected if The vulnerable endpoint responds to unauthenticated requests without requiring login
Your environment is affected if CopyPress plugin version 1.4.5 or lower is installed and contains an unauthenticated file inclusion endpoint accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade CopyPress to the latest version >1.4.5 immediately. If no patched version is available, disable the plugin and implement WAF rules to block directory traversal patterns in HTTP requests.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69118 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69118 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data