CVE-2025-69122
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated PHP Object Injection in SeaFood Company <= 1.4 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn unauthenticated PHP Object Injection vulnerability exists in SeaFood Company version 1.4 and below. Attackers can exploit this by sending malicious serialized PHP objects to vulnerable input points, potentially achieving remote code execution through the PHP unserialize() function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SeaFood Company versionLocate the version identifier in the application's main file, changelog, or metadata (common locations: index.php, version.php, README, or admin dashboard About section). Compare the installed version to 1.4 or below.Affected if The installed version is 1.4 or lower.
-
Find unserialize() usage on user inputSearch the application source code for calls to unserialize() that process input from $_GET, $_POST, $_COOKIE, or similar user-controllable sources. Review PHP files in any input handling directories.Affected if Code contains unserialize() applied to any user-supplied data without prior validation.
-
Identify exposed input endpointsReview the application's routing or entry points (e.g., index.php, form handlers, API endpoints) to determine which accept and process user input that could reach the vulnerable unserialize() call.Affected if Any endpoint accessible without authentication accepts data that flows to an unprotected unserialize() call.
-
Check for input validation on serialized dataInspect the code around the unserialize() call for any filtering, validation, or sanitization logic designed to block or validate serialized PHP objects before deserialization.Affected if No validation or sanitization exists to block malicious serialized objects.
The environment is affected if SeaFood Company version 1.4 or lower is installed AND unauthenticated user input reaches an unprotected unserialize() function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate SeaFood Company to a version newer than 1.4 immediately. If no patched version is available, disable the affected component and implement input validation to block serialized data on user-facing endpoints.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69122 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69122 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data