Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-69189

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in EMV JobBank allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects JobBank: from n/a through 1.2.3.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A Missing Authorization vulnerability in EMV JobBank allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized users to access sensitive functionality or data that should be restricted based on role or privilege.

MitigationReview and correct the access control security level configurations in JobBank to ensure proper authorization checks are enforced for all sensitive operations, and implement role-based access controls where missing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify EMV JobBank installation and version
    Locate the EMV JobBank application installation directory and check for version information in configuration files, about pages, or the application metadata
    Affected if The installed version is any version of EMV JobBank prior to the patched release that addresses missing authorization controls
  2. Review access control security level configuration
    Examine JobBank's security configuration files (often in config/, settings/, or similar directories) for security level or access control settings. Look for parameters related to authorization enforcement, privilege levels, or role-based access configuration.
    Affected if Security level is set to a permissive mode, disabled, or incorrectly configured allowing unauthorized access to privileged functions
  3. Verify authorization enforcement on sensitive endpoints
    Test or inspect whether sensitive operations (user management, data access, job submissions, administrative functions) properly validate user permissions before executing. Check if unauthenticated or low-privilege requests to these endpoints are rejected.
    Affected if Sensitive endpoints execute requests without verifying the user has the required role or privilege level
  4. Inspect role-based access control implementation
    Review the application's user/role management system to confirm that roles are defined and that functions are restricted to appropriate roles. Check database tables or configuration for role assignments and permission mappings.
    Affected if Roles exist but are not properly enforced, or sensitive functions lack role-based restrictions entirely
  5. Check for missing authorization checks in application code
    If access to application source or logs is available, search for authorization validation patterns around sensitive operations. Look for instances where business logic executes without prior permission verification.
    Affected if Code paths exist where sensitive operations can be reached without authorization validation

A user is affected if EMV JobBank is installed and access control security levels are misconfigured or missing, allowing unauthorized access to restricted functionality.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review and correct the access control security level configurations in JobBank to ensure proper authorization checks are enforced for all sensitive operations, and implement role-based access controls where missing.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69189 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69189 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data