CVE-2025-69233
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to multiple time-of-check time-of-use race conditions in the resource count check and increment logic, as well as missing validations, users of the platform are able to exceed the allocation limits configured for their accounts/domains. This can be used by an attacker to degrade the infrastructure's resources and lead to denial of service conditions. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack versions 4.20.3.0 or 4.22.0.1, or later, which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceApache CloudStack contains multiple time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race conditions in resource count validation and increment logic, combined with missing input validations. These flaws allow authenticated users to exceed configured allocation limits for their accounts/domains by exploiting the race between check and increment operations, potentially degrading infrastructure resources and causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0.0, < 4.20.3.0>= 4.21.0.0, < 4.22.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Apache CloudStack versionRun 'rpm -q cloudstack-management' on the management server host, or query the CloudStack API using the 'listVersions' command via the cloudmonkey CLI or direct API call to the management serverAffected if The installed version is 4.0.0 <= version < 4.20.3.0 OR 4.21.0.0 <= version < 4.22.0.1
-
Check if resource limits are configured for accounts or domainsQuery the CloudStack database: 'SELECT account, domain_id, resource_type, max FROM cloud.resource_limit;' or use the 'listResourceLimits' API commandAffected if Any resource limits (cpu, memory, storage, etc.) are set for accounts or domains - the vulnerability allows bypassing these limits through race conditions
-
Verify authenticated user access to the CloudStack APIConfirm that the CloudStack management server API endpoint (port 8096 or 443) is accessible and that non-admin user accounts can authenticate via the 'login' API commandAffected if Regular (non-root admin) user accounts exist and can authenticate - these users can exploit the TOCTOU race condition to exceed allocation limits
-
Check for abnormal resource consumption patternsReview CloudStack usage records in the 'cloud.usage' and 'cloud.usage_event' tables, or monitor via 'listUsageRecords' API, looking for sudden spikes in resource creation that exceed configured limitsAffected if Usage records show resource counts exceeding the configured limits for any account or domain
A user is affected if their CloudStack installation version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND they have resource limits configured AND authenticated users can access the API to trigger the race condition.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.20.3.04.22.0.1
Upgrade Apache CloudStack to version 4.20.3.0, 4.22.0.1, or later to patch the race conditions and missing validations in resource limit enforcement.
Apache CloudStack 4.20.3.0 or 4.22.0.1 (or later stable release)
- Review current Apache CloudStack installation to confirm the exact version running using 'cloudstack-sysvm' or management server logs
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Take a complete backup of the CloudStack database and configuration files
- Download Apache CloudStack 4.20.3.0 or 4.22.0.1 (or later stable release) from the official Apache CloudStack repository
- Stop all CloudStack services on the management server(s) using 'cloudstack-management stop' or equivalent systemctl commands
- Upgrade the CloudStack packages using the appropriate package manager for your distribution (e.g., rpm or deb)
- Run database migration scripts if included in the upgrade (typically via 'cloudstack-management --setup-db')
- Start CloudStack management services and verify they are running
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69233 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69233 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data