RaythaApplication

CVE-2025-69243

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Raytha CMS is vulnerable to User Enumeration in password reset functionality. Difference in messages could allow an attacker to determine if the login is valid or not, enabling a brute force attack with valid logins. This issue was fixed in version 1.5.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Raytha CMS password reset functionality reveals different error messages for valid versus invalid usernames, allowing attackers to enumerate valid user accounts. This information can then be used to launch targeted brute force attacks against known-valid accounts.

MitigationUpgrade to Raytha CMS version 1.5.0 or later, which implements generic error messages that do not disclose account validity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RaythaApplication
Affected:< 1.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Raytha CMS version
    Access the Raytha CMS admin dashboard and navigate to Settings > About, or check the version file in the deployment (often in a version.json, appsettings.json, or the application's footer/signature)
    Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 1.5.0 (e.g., 1.4.x, 1.3.x, etc.)
  2. Locate the password reset endpoint
    Access the login page and locate the 'Forgot Password' or password reset link. Common paths include /login, /account/forgot-password, or /password-reset
    Affected if The password reset functionality exists and is accessible
  3. Test password reset with a known invalid username
    Submit the password reset form using an email address or username that does not exist in the system. Observe the error message or response returned
    Affected if The response indicates that the account does not exist or provides a specific error for invalid users
  4. Test password reset with a known valid username
    Submit the password reset form using an email address or username that is confirmed to exist in the system (e.g., your own admin account). Observe the error message or response returned
    Affected if The response differs from the invalid username response (e.g., says email sent, account found, or provides different wording)
  5. Compare error message responses
    Review both responses side by side. Check if the system reveals whether an account is valid through different error messages, timing differences, or different UI feedback
    Affected if The error messages or responses differ between valid and invalid usernames, confirming user enumeration is possible

You are affected if your Raytha CMS version is below 1.5.0 AND the password reset endpoint returns different responses for valid versus invalid usernames, allowing account enumeration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.5.0 or later
Fixed in 1.5.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Raytha CMS version 1.5.0 or later, which implements generic error messages that do not disclose account validity.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.5.0

  1. Upgrade Raytha CMS to version 1.5.0 or later
  2. After upgrade, verify the password reset functionality returns consistent messages regardless of whether the account exists

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Raytha Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69243 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69243 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data