CVE-2025-69275
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component vulnerability in Broadcom DX NetOps Spectrum on Windows, Linux allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects DX NetOps Spectrum: 24.3.9 and earlier.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDOM-based XSS vulnerability in Broadcom DX NetOps Spectrum caused by a vulnerable third-party component dependency. The flaw allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into the DOM through the client-side application, potentially executing in users' browsers when they interact with affected interfaces.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 24.3.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed DX NetOps Spectrum versionRun 'spectroadmin version' or check the Spectrum OneClick web interface footer for the version number, or query the OneClick server status pageAffected if The installed version is 24.3.9 or earlier (any version below 24.3.10)
-
Confirm the OneClick web component is accessibleAccess the Spectrum OneClick web console URL (typically https://hostname:8443/oneclick) in a browser and verify the application loadsAffected if The OneClick web interface is exposed and accessible to users or attackers
-
Determine if the vulnerable third-party component is presentInspect the Spectrum installation directory for third-party JavaScript libraries, typically found under $SPECROOT/tomcat/webapps/oneclick/WEB-INF/lib or similar paths, and cross-reference with known vulnerable library versionsAffected if A vulnerable version of the third-party dependency (not specified in CVE details) is present in the deployment
-
Review web access logs for XSS indicatorsExamine OneClick server access logs (usually in $SPECROOT/tomcat/logs) for suspicious patterns such as <script>, javascript:, or event handlers in URL parametersAffected if Log analysis reveals malicious script injection attempts targeting the OneClick interface
The environment is affected if DX NetOps Spectrum version is below 24.3.10 and the OneClick web interface is accessible to users or attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.3.10
Update DX NetOps Spectrum to a version beyond 24.3.9 once available, or implement output encoding and input validation controls on the client side to neutralize XSS payloads before DOM manipulation occurs.
24.3.10 or later
- Upgrade DX NetOps Spectrum to version 24.3.10 or later
- After upgrade, verify the DOM-based XSS vulnerability is resolved by reviewing release notes or patch documentation
- Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69275 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69275 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data