CVE-2025-69301
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ThemeGoods PhotoMe photome allows Object Injection.This issue affects PhotoMe: from n/a through <= 5.6.11.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA deserialization vulnerability in the ThemeGoods PhotoMe plugin allows remote attackers to inject malicious PHP objects via unserialize() on untrusted data. This object injection can potentially lead to remote code execution if suitable 'gadget chains' exist in the application or loaded libraries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate PhotoMe plugin filesSearch your web server filesystem for directories named 'photome', 'PhotoMe', or 'tg-photome' within your CMS or theme plugins directory. Common paths include /wp-content/plugins/, /sites/all/modules/, or within theme directories.Affected if The plugin directory exists on the server
-
Identify the installed versionOpen the main plugin file (typically index.php, main.php, or a dedicated version file within the PhotoMe directory) and locate the version declaration comment or variable. Compare this version number to any official changelogs or release notes from ThemeGoods.Affected if The version cannot be determined or is older than the patched version
-
Find insecure unserialize callsWithin the PhotoMe plugin directory, search all PHP files for the pattern 'unserialize(' using grep, a file search tool, or manual code review. Examine each occurrence to determine if the data being deserialized originates from user input (GET, POST, COOKIE, or request parameters).Affected if Code uses unserialize() on data that comes directly from user requests without prior validation
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint is accessibleReview the PHP files containing insecure unserialize() calls to identify the HTTP endpoint or function that receives the untrusted input. Confirm this endpoint is accessible via the web application (not restricted by authentication or firewall rules).Affected if The endpoint handling untrusted deserialized data is publicly accessible
You are affected if the PhotoMe plugin is installed, uses an unpatched version, and contains unserialize() calls on user-supplied data that is reachable from your application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate PhotoMe to the latest patched version immediately. If no update is available, disable the plugin and review the codebase for insecure use of unserialize() - replace with json_decode() and implement strict input validation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69301 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69301 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data