CVE-2025-69307
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in TeconceTheme Medinik Core medinik-core allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Medinik Core: from n/a through <= 1.3.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Medinik Core theme (versions <= 1.3.6) where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries. An attacker can exploit this by injecting malicious SQL code through vulnerable parameters, potentially allowing unauthorized data extraction or database manipulation. The 'blind' classification means the attacker infers results from application behavior rather than seeing direct output.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Medinik Core theme is installedAccess the WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Appearance > Themes, and look for the Medinik Core theme in the installed themes list.Affected if The theme is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed version numberCheck the theme's style.css file (typically in wp-content/themes/medinik-core/) for the 'Version' header, or view the theme details in the WordPress themes admin page.Affected if The version is 1.3.6 or lower
-
Confirm the theme is active on the siteIn WordPress admin > Appearance > Themes, check if Medinik Core is the currently active theme or if a child theme based on Medinik Core is active.Affected if The theme or a child theme is activated and publicly accessible
-
Determine if user input reaches the vulnerable code pathReview theme files for any AJAX handlers, form processing, or URL parameters that interact with database queries without proper sanitization. Common locations include functions.php, any files handling search or filter parameters, or custom post type queries.Affected if The theme processes user-supplied parameters (such as search queries, filter options, or ID values) through database queries without prepared statements or input validation
The environment is affected if the Medinik Core theme (version 1.3.6 or lower) is installed and active on a WordPress site, with user input being directly used in SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Medinik Core to the latest version if a patch is available. If no patch exists, identify and parameterize the vulnerable SQL query(s), or apply a WAF rule to block SQL injection attempts as a temporary measure while developing a permanent fix.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69307 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69307 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data