CVE-2025-69310
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in TeconceTheme Woodly Core woodly-core allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Woodly Core: from n/a through <= 1.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Woodly Core component of the TeconceTheme. Attackers can inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input parameters, allowing data exfiltration or database manipulation without seeing direct output. The vulnerability affects versions up to and including 1.4.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Woodly Core installationSearch your web application directories for files or components named 'Woodly Core' or 'woodly' - check theme/plugin directories, composer.json, or package.json for TeconceTheme referencesAffected if Woodly Core component from TeconceTheme is present in the environment
-
Determine installed versionLocate version information in version files, headers, or metadata within the Woodly Core component (often in a VERSION file, readme, or code comments)Affected if The identified version is 1.4 or lower (1.0 through 1.4 inclusive)
-
Identify SQL entry pointsReview source code for database queries that use user-supplied input (GET/POST parameters, cookies, or HTTP headers) without proper sanitization or parameterized queriesAffected if Unsanitized input parameters are used directly in SQL queries within the Woodly Core component
-
Check query implementationSearch code for raw SQL execution patterns (mysqli_query, PDO::query, direct string concatenation in SQL statements) and verify if prepared statements or parameter binding are usedAffected if Database queries concatenate user input directly into SQL strings without using prepared statements
-
Verify blind SQL injection exposureTest suspected input parameters with time-based or boolean-based SQL injection payloads (e.g., adding 'AND SLEEP(5)' or 'AND 1=1' to parameter values) in a non-production test environmentAffected if Application responds to injection payloads, indicating unsanitized input is processed in SQL contexts
You are affected if the Woodly Core component from TeconceTheme is installed at version 1.4 or lower and uses unsanitized user input in direct SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of Woodly Core once released, or implement proper input validation and parameterized queries (prepared statements) at all database interaction points to neutralize SQL injection vectors.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69310 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69310 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data