CVE-2025-69329
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Jthemes Prestige prestige allows Object Injection.This issue affects Prestige: from n/a through < 1.4.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Jthemes Prestige theme below version 1.4.1 is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection via deserialization of untrusted data. Attackers can exploit this by sending crafted serialized PHP objects to vulnerable endpoints, potentially achieving remote code execution if magic methods exist in the theme or associated plugins.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Prestige theme versionLocate the theme's version file (typically in style.css header, version.php, or theme config) and note the version number reportedAffected if Version is below 1.4.1 (for example, 1.4.0, 1.3.x, etc.)
-
Locate PHP unserialize() calls in theme filesSearch theme source files for 'unserialize' function calls and review which ones process data from $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST, or HTTP headersAffected if The theme contains unserialize() calls that process user-supplied input without prior validation
-
Identify endpoints accepting serialized dataReview theme PHP files for endpoints that accept and process serialized data from HTTP requests, including AJAX handlers or form processorsAffected if User-accessible endpoints exist that accept and deserialize data from request parameters
-
Check for magic methods in theme or pluginsSearch theme and active plugin files for magic methods (such as __destruct, __wakeup, __invoke, __toString) that could be chained for code executionAffected if Magic methods are present in the theme or associated plugins that could be triggered via object injection
User is affected if the Prestige theme version is below 1.4.1 AND the theme processes untrusted serialized PHP data through accessible unserialize() calls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the Prestige theme to version 1.4.1 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, disable the theme and review access to any PHP unserialize() calls that process user input.
Prestige version 1.4.1 or latest available
- 1. Backup your entire WordPress site and database before making any changes
- 2. Obtain Prestige theme version 1.4.1 or the latest available version from the official Jthemes source
- 3. Update the Prestige theme through your WordPress dashboard (Appearance > Themes) or via FTP/SFTP upload
- 4. Verify the update was successful by checking the installed theme version
- 5. Test critical site functionality to ensure the update did not break any features
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69329 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data