Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-69332

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Subscriber Broken Access Control in Bookify <= 1.1.1 versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a Broken Access Control vulnerability in the Bookify plugin (likely a WordPress plugin) affecting versions 1.1.1 and below. The vulnerability allows users with the 'subscriber' role—which is typically the lowest privilege role in WordPress—to access functionality or data that should be restricted to higher-privileged users (administrators, editors, etc.). This indicates the plugin fails to properly enforce role-based capability checks before performing sensitive operations.

MitigationUpdate Bookify to the latest version if available, or implement proper capability checks (using current_user_can()) and nonce verification on all sensitive functions. Until patched, consider disabling subscriber registration or limiting the subscriber role capabilities.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Bookify plugin installation and version
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate Bookify. Check the version number listed under the plugin name. Alternatively, inspect the plugin main file (commonly plugin-name.php) and look for a version definition comment or constant.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.1.1 or lower.
  2. Confirm subscriber role is active
    In WordPress admin, go to Users > Users and check if any users with the Subscriber role exist. Also go to Settings > General and verify that anyone can register with the Subscriber role selected as the default role.
    Affected if Subscriber role users exist or subscriber registration is enabled on the site.
  3. Inspect plugin for capability checks
    Access the Bookify plugin files via FTP or file manager. Examine PHP files containing sensitive functions (such as database operations, content creation, settings changes, or AJAX handlers). Look for calls to current_user_can() before performing privileged actions.
    Affected if The plugin code lacks proper current_user_can() capability checks before sensitive operations.
  4. Test subscriber access to privileged functions
    Log in as a user with the Subscriber role. Attempt to access any Bookify admin pages, settings panels, or direct URLs that should only be accessible to administrators. Observe whether access is granted without proper authorization.
    Affected if A subscriber-level user can access pages or functions intended only for administrators or higher roles.

Your environment is affected if Bookify plugin version 1.1.1 or lower is installed AND subscriber role users exist or can register AND the plugin permits subscriber-level access to administrative functions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Bookify to the latest version if available, or implement proper capability checks (using current_user_can()) and nonce verification on all sensitive functions. Until patched, consider disabling subscriber registration or limiting the subscriber role capabilities.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69332 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69332 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data