SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-69338

CRITICAL · 9.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in don-themes Riode Core riode-core allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Riode Core: from n/a through <= 1.6.26.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in don-themes Riode Core theme allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user inputs, enabling blind SQL injection attacks where they can infer database content from application behavior changes.

MitigationUpdate Riode Core theme to the latest patched version; if no patch is available, implement parameterized queries and proper input validation/sanitization on all database query paths.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Riode Core theme is installed
    Check your WordPress themes directory (wp-content/themes/) for a folder named 'riode' or 'riode-core'. Look for style.css file with 'Theme Name: Riode' or similar header.
    Affected if The Riode Core theme folder exists in the themes directory.
  2. Determine the installed version of Riode Core
    Open the theme's style.css file in the Riode theme folder and look for the 'Version:' declaration in the theme header comments. Compare this version number against any known patched versions.
    Affected if The installed version is older than the latest patched version or if you cannot determine the version and the theme is present.
  3. Locate PHP files handling database queries
    Search the Riode theme folder for PHP files containing '$wpdb->prepare', '$wpdb->query', or direct SQL query construction. Use a file search or grep for 'wpdb' and 'SELECT' patterns.
    Affected if The theme contains PHP files that interact with the WordPress database.
  4. Inspect user input handling in query code
    In the PHP files found, look for SQL queries that incorporate $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST, or other user-supplied parameters without using $wpdb->prepare() or parameterized queries.
    Affected if User input from request parameters is directly concatenated into SQL queries without sanitization or prepared statements.
  5. Check for vulnerable input sources
    Examine the identified files for unsanitized use of parameters like id, cat, category, search, orderby, or any query string parameters passed to database queries.
    Affected if Any user-accessible URL parameters are used in SQL queries without proper escaping or prepared statement binding.

You are affected if the Riode Core theme is installed and its version does not have the SQL injection vulnerability patched, particularly if the theme processes user input into database queries without using prepared statements.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Riode Core theme to the latest patched version; if no patch is available, implement parameterized queries and proper input validation/sanitization on all database query paths.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69338 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69338 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data