CVE-2025-69399
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in ThemeREX Cobble cobble allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Cobble: from n/a through <= 1.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe ThemeREX Cobble theme (version <=1.7) contains a PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability where the application improperly controls filenames used in include/require statements. This allows attackers to include arbitrary local PHP files, potentially leading to remote code execution if they can control the included files or upload malicious content to locations the PHP process can access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if ThemeREX Cobble theme is installedLocate theme files by searching for 'cobble' or 'trx_cobble' in the wp-content/themes directory (for WordPress) or theme folder structure. Common paths: /wp-content/themes/cobble/ or /themes/cobble/Affected if The theme folder named 'cobble' or containing 'cobble' branding is present on the server
-
Determine the installed theme versionOpen the theme's style.css, info.txt, or theme.json file and locate the 'Version:' header, or check version.php if it exists. Compare the version number against the affected range <=1.7Affected if The reported version is 1.7 or any lower version number
-
Locate include/require statements in theme PHP filesSearch all PHP files in the theme directory for patterns like 'include(', 'require(', 'include_once(', 'require_once(' where a variable is used directly, such as 'include($', 'require($_', 'include(${$'. Use grep or a code search tool across the theme folderAffected if PHP files contain include/require statements that use variable parameters without sanitization (e.g., include($_GET['file']); or include($file); where $file originates from user input)
-
Identify parameters that flow from user input to include/requireReview the vulnerable include/require code found in step 3. Trace the variable back to its source (GET, POST, COOKIE, REQUEST parameters). Check if the parameter is used directly or with minimal string concatenation in the include/require callAffected if User-supplied parameters (from URL, form, or cookie) are passed directly or with minimal manipulation into include or require statements
-
Check for unexpected files in accessible directoriesInspect directories that the PHP process can read: wp-content/uploads/, /tmp/, /var/tmp/, or any writable folder. Look for unfamiliar .php files, suspicious .txt files, or files with encoded content that may have been uploaded as part of an LFI exploitationAffected if Unexpected PHP files exist in upload folders or temporary directories, or existing files have been modified with malicious code
-
Review access logs for LFI exploitation patternsExamine web server access logs (access.log, error.log) for requests containing path traversal sequences like '../', '..\', or absolute paths in query parameters that match theme include endpoints. Search for patterns such as '?file=', '?page=', '?template=' with directory traversal charactersAffected if Logs show requests with ../ sequences or absolute file paths targeting theme PHP files, indicating scanning or exploitation attempts
You are affected if the ThemeREX Cobble theme version is 1.7 or lower AND the theme's PHP code uses include/require statements with unsanitized user-controlled parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade ThemeREX Cobble to the latest version that addresses this vulnerability, or implement strict input validation and whitelisting for any user-controlled parameters used in include/require statements to prevent arbitrary file inclusion.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69399 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69399 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data