CVE-2025-69563
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedcode-projects Mobile Shop Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /ExLogin.php via the Password parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencecode-projects Mobile Shop Management System 1.0 contains a critical SQL Injection vulnerability in the /ExLogin.php script where the Password parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries. This enables authentication bypass and potential full database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Mobile Shop Management System installationLocate the web application files in the server's web root directory. Look for files typical to a PHP-based web application, including ExLogin.phpAffected if The application code-projects Mobile Shop Management System version 1.0 is present on the server
-
Locate the vulnerable scriptSearch for the ExLogin.php file within the web application directory structureAffected if The ExLogin.php file exists in the application root or admin directory
-
Inspect Password parameter handling in ExLogin.phpOpen ExLogin.php and examine the code that handles the Password parameter from the login form. Look for SQL queries that directly concatenate or embed the Password input without using prepared statements or parameter bindingAffected if The code contains SQL queries that directly use the Password parameter without sanitization, prepared statements, or parameterized queries
-
Verify database user privilegesCheck the database configuration file to identify the database user credentials used by the applicationAffected if The application connects to the database with a user that has excessive privileges beyond what the application requires
-
Confirm application is accessibleVerify that the ExLogin.php endpoint is accessible over the network (HTTP/HTTPS)Affected if The login page is reachable and the vulnerable code can be triggered by sending a crafted Password parameter
The environment is affected if code-projects Mobile Shop Management System version 1.0 is installed and the ExLogin.php script contains direct SQL query construction using the unsanitized Password parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) for the Password parameter and all user inputs. Apply input validation and ensure the database user follows the principle of least privilege.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation10.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69563 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69563 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data