CVE-2025-6961
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Campcodes Employee Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /mark.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the /mark.php file of Campcodes Employee Management System 1.0. The ID parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or potential privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Employee Management System installationLocate the web application's installation directory. Check for files like login.php, index.php, or folder structures indicating Campcodes Employee Management System. Check version.txt, README files, or admin panels for version number.Affected if The application is Campcodes Employee Management System version 1.0 specifically.
-
Verify mark.php existsLocate the mark.php file within the web application directory structure, typically in the root or a module folder.Affected if The mark.php file exists in the application.
-
Inspect mark.php for ID parameter handlingOpen mark.php in a text editor or use 'grep -n "ID" mark.php' to locate where the ID parameter is processed. Search for $_GET['id'], $_POST['id'], or $_REQUEST['id'] usage.Affected if The file contains direct use of the ID parameter in SQL queries without visible sanitization or parameterization.
-
Check for SQL injection mitigationsExamine the mark.php code around the ID parameter usage. Look for functions like mysqli_prepare, prepared statements, or explicit sanitization functions (mysqli_real_escape_string, htmlspecialchars used in SQL context).Affected if No prepared statements, parameterized queries, or SQL-specific escaping functions are found around the ID parameter in SQL queries.
-
Test the ID parameter if accessibleIf the application is in a test environment, access mark.php?id=1' (note the apostrophe) and observe for SQL errors or unexpected database behavior. In production, skip this active test.Affected if The application responds with SQL syntax errors or unusual database responses when special characters are passed to the ID parameter.
A user is affected if they run Campcodes Employee Management System version 1.0 with the mark.php file accessible and the ID parameter is used in dynamic SQL queries without prepared statements or proper sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements for the ID parameter in mark.php. If no vendor patch is available, implement strict input validation and sanitize user-supplied input before database queries.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6961 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6961 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data