CVE-2025-69614
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Access Control via activation token reuse on the password-reset endpoint allowing unauthorized password resets and full account takeover. Affected Product: Deutsche Telekom AG Telekom Account Management Portal, versions before 2025-10-27, fixed 2025-10-31.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Telekom Account Management Portal had an Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in its password-reset endpoint. The activation tokens used for password reset could be reused multiple times instead of being invalidated after single use, allowing an attacker to intercept or guess a valid token and use it repeatedly to reset the password and take over the account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025-10-27CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of Telekom Account Management PortalLocate and inspect the application version file, about page, or API endpoint that exposes version information. Check installation directories, configuration files, or the application header/footer for version strings.Affected if The version displayed is earlier than 2025-10-27 or the version cannot be determined (indicating an unpatched installation)
-
Confirm password reset endpoint is accessibleVerify the password reset functionality is enabled and reachable. Check if the /password-reset or similar endpoint responds to requests. Inspect application routing configuration for password reset routes.Affected if The password reset endpoint is active and accepts requests, making the token reuse vulnerability applicable
-
Review password reset token implementationExamine application logs or source code for token handling logic in the password reset module. Look for code that processes activation tokens and determines whether tokens are validated for single-use only.Affected if Token validation logic does not enforce one-time use or lacks proper expiration checks
-
Check token storage mechanismInspect the database or token store for how reset tokens are persisted. Look for flags or fields that should indicate token usage status after a password reset is completed.Affected if Tokens remain valid after successful password reset or there is no mechanism to mark tokens as consumed
The environment is affected if the Telekom Account Management Portal version is earlier than 2025-10-27 and the password reset functionality is enabled, as the activation token can be reused for multiple password resets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025-10-27
Apply the vendor patch released on 2025-10-31 which implements proper single-use token enforcement and token invalidation after successful password reset. Additionally, audit recent accounttakeover events for signs of exploitation.
Version released on or after 2025-10-31 (2025-10-27 or later release)
- 1. Identify the current version of Deutsche Telekom AG Telekom Account Management Portal in use
- 2. If the current version was released before 2025-10-27, plan for an upgrade
- 3. Contact Deutsche Telekom AG official support or download center to obtain the fixed version released on or after 2025-10-31
- 4. Before upgrading, ensure you have valid backups of the system and user data
- 5. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 6. Apply the upgrade following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure
- 7. After upgrade, verify that the password reset functionality works correctly
- 8. Confirm the token reuse vulnerability is no longer present by testing that used activation tokens are rejected on subsequent reset attempts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69614 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69614 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data