CVE-2025-69755
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in Neterbit NW-431F Router vNW-431F-20241014-IR03 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via a crafted command to the at_command.asp interface
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Neterbit NW-431F Router firmware vNW-431F-20241014-IR03 contains a command injection vulnerability in the at_command.asp web interface. A remote attacker can send crafted commands through this interface to both extract sensitive information from the device and achieve arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the web server process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router's web interface or check the device label/menu to confirm the exact model is Neterbit NW-431FAffected if The device is a Neterbit NW-431F router
-
Check firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to the status or system information page to view the installed firmware versionAffected if No patched firmware version is available from the vendor, or the installed version predates the fix
-
Verify at_command.asp is accessibleAttempt to access http://<router-ip>/at_command.asp from a browser. Check if the page loads or returns any response (even an error) rather than a 404 Not FoundAffected if The at_command.asp page is accessible and responds (indicating the endpoint exists on the device)
-
Check remote management settingsIn the router web interface, go to the remote management or administration settings section. Look for options that enable web interface access from WAN/external IP addressesAffected if Remote management from WAN is enabled, allowing the at_command.asp page to be reached from the internet
The defender is affected if they have a Neterbit NW-431F router with the vulnerable at_command.asp endpoint accessible (especially from WAN) and are running firmware prior to the vendor patch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply any vendor firmware update if available. If no patch exists, restrict access to the router's web management interface to trusted networks only, or disable the at_command.asp functionality via access controls until a fix can be applied.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69755 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69755 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data