CVE-2025-6995
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper use of encryption in the agent of Ivanti Endpoint Manager before version 2024 SU3 and 2022 SU8 Security Update 1 allows a local authenticated attacker to decrypt other users’ passwords.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper encryption implementation in the Ivanti Endpoint Manager agent before version 2024 SU3 and 2022 SU8 Security Update 1 allows a locally authenticated attacker to decrypt passwords belonging to other users due to cryptographic weaknesses in the credential storage mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2022= 2022= 2024CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Ivanti Endpoint Manager agent installationCheck for the Ivanti Endpoint Manager agent installation on the system. Look for the agent service or executable, typically installed in Program Files\Ivanti\ or check Windows Services for 'Ivanti Endpoint Manager' or 'LANDesk' related services.Affected if The agent is installed and running on the system.
-
Identify the installed versionLocate the agent version information. Right-click the agent executable (typically named something like 'WdService.exe' or 'LDISERV32.exe' in the Ivanti installation directory) and view Properties, or query the service information via command line using 'sc query' or 'Get-Service' in PowerShell to retrieve version details.Affected if The version is 2024 (before SU3) or 2022 (before SU8 Security Update 1). Versions prior to 2022 are also affected.
-
Verify credential storage is in useCheck if the Endpoint Manager agent has been configured to manage credentials. Look for configured user accounts, saved passwords, or credential policies within the agent console, or check for stored credential files in the agent's data directory.Affected if The agent has stored credentials, passwords, or authentication configurations for users or network resources.
-
Check for vulnerable credential storage filesInspect the agent's credential storage location. The agent stores credentials in encrypted format in its configuration or database files within the installation directory. Look for files like '*.db', 'cred*.*', or XML configuration files that may contain encrypted password data.Affected if Credential storage files exist and contain encrypted passwords that could be decrypted by a locally authenticated attacker.
A system is affected if the Ivanti Endpoint Manager agent is installed with version 2024 (before SU3), 2022 (before SU8 SU1), or earlier, and the agent stores or manages credentials that could be accessed by a local authenticated user.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2022
Apply the security updates (2024 SU3 or 2022 SU8 Security Update 1 or later) to upgrade the Ivanti Endpoint Manager agent and remediate the improper encryption.
2024 SU3 (for 2024.x users) or 2022 SU8 Security Update 1 (for 2022.x users)
- Identify the current version of Ivanti Endpoint Manager by checking the agent or server console
- Determine your upgrade path: if on a version < 2022 or on 2022, target 2022 SU8 Security Update 1; if on 2024, target 2024 SU3
- Review Ivanti's official upgrade documentation and release notes for the target version
- Create a complete backup of the current Endpoint Manager configuration and database
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first to verify compatibility
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Apply the upgrade to the Endpoint Manager server following Ivanti's documented procedures
- After upgrade, verify the agent versions and ensure all clients are updated to the patched version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6995 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6995 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data