NULL Pointer DereferenceWeakness · CWE-476

CVE-2025-70070

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue in Assimp v.6.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the FBXMeshGeometry.cpp, MeshGeometry::MeshGeometry()

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Assimp v6.0.2's FBX mesh parsing code. Specifically, the MeshGeometry::MeshGeometry() constructor in FBXMeshGeometry.cpp fails to properly handle malformed FBX files, likely due to missing bounds checking or validation during mesh geometry construction, causing a crash or hang when processing crafted input.

MitigationAvoid processing untrusted or malformed FBX files with Assimp v6.0.2. Update to any patched version released by the Assimp project once available, or implement input validation/size limits on FBX meshes before passing to Assimp.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Assimp version
    Run 'assimp version' from command line, or check the library version programmatically via aiGetVersion() or by inspecting the shared library binary (e.g., 'strings libassimp.so | grep -i "6.0"' or checking file metadata)
    Affected if The installed version is Assimp v6.0.2 exactly
  2. Confirm FBX importer is available
    Check if the FBX importer module exists in the Assimp library directory (typically named 'libassimp_importer.so' or check 'assimp info --help' for FBX support listed), or verify the FBX file format handler is registered in your application
    Affected if The FBX importer module is present and loaded by the application
  3. Determine if your application parses FBX files
    Review application code or runtime configuration for any calls to Assimp's aiImportFile() or aiImportFileEx() with .fbx file extensions, or check if FBX files are processed in any data import pipeline
    Affected if The application or service imports or processes FBX files from any source
  4. Assess source trust level of FBX files
    Identify whether FBX files come from untrusted sources (user uploads, external APIs, network endpoints, or any source outside your controlled asset pipeline)
    Affected if FBX files from untrusted or external sources are processed by Assimp
  5. Check for crash/hang behavior with FBX input
    If currently experiencing unexplained crashes or hangs during FBX file loading, review application logs and crash dumps for faults occurring in Assimp's FBXMeshGeometry.cpp or MeshGeometry constructor code
    Affected if Crashes or hangs occur specifically when loading FBX files through Assimp v6.0.2

You are affected if you run Assimp v6.0.2 and your application loads FBX files, especially from untrusted sources, as the vulnerability is triggered during mesh geometry construction in malformed FBX parsing.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Avoid processing untrusted or malformed FBX files with Assimp v6.0.2. Update to any patched version released by the Assimp project once available, or implement input validation/size limits on FBX meshes before passing to Assimp.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-70070 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-70070 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data