CVE-2025-70830
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability in the Freemarker template engine of Datart v1.0.0-rc.3 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via injecting crafted Freemarker template syntax into the SQL script field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability exists in the Freemarker template engine of Datart v1.0.0-rc.3. Authenticated attackers can inject malicious Freemarker template syntax into the SQL script field, leading to arbitrary code execution on the server due to unsafe template rendering.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Datart installationLocate the Datart application installation directory or check running services for the Datart web applicationAffected if Datart is installed and running
-
Identify installed Datart versionCheck the application version file, about page, or startup logs for the exact Datart version numberAffected if The installed version is v1.0.0-rc.3 or any version prior to the patched release
-
Verify SQL script feature is accessibleCheck if the SQL script field functionality is enabled in the Datart configuration or admin settingsAffected if Users with authenticated access can create or edit SQL scripts through the interface
-
Confirm Freemarker template processing in SQL fieldsInspect the template rendering configuration or test submitting Freemarker syntax (such as ${7*7}) into a SQL script field to see if it gets evaluatedAffected if Freemarker template expressions are parsed and rendered rather than treated as plain text
You are affected if running Datart v1.0.0-rc.3 or earlier where authenticated users can submit SQL scripts containing Freemarker template syntax that gets processed by the template engine.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Datart that addresses this vulnerability, or implement input validation/sanitization to prevent Freemarker template syntax from being processed in the SQL script field.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-70830 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-70830 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data