CVE-2025-71284
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSynway SMG Gateway Management Software contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the RADIUS configuration endpoint at /en/9-2radius.php where the radius_address POST parameter is split and interpolated directly into a sed command without sanitization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands by submitting a POST request with crafted radius_address, radius_address2, shared_secret2, source_ip, timeout, or retry parameters along with save=1 and enable_radius=1 to achieve remote code execution. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-07-11 (UTC).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSynway SMG Gateway Management Software contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the RADIUS configuration endpoint at /en/9-2radius.php. The radius_address POST parameter is split and interpolated directly into a sed command without any sanitization, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands. Successful exploitation requires POST requests with save=1 and enable_radius=1 along with crafted parameters (radius_address, radius_address2, shared_secret2, source_ip, timeout, or retry) to achieve remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Synway SMG Gateway is accessibleIdentify if the Synway SMG Gateway Management Software web interface is running by accessing the management URL (typically on ports 80/443 or a vendor-defined port). Look for the Synway login page or management interface.Affected if The Synway SMG Gateway Management Software web interface is reachable on the network.
-
Check for the vulnerable RADIUS endpointVerify the existence of the /en/9-2radius.php endpoint by attempting to access it directly via HTTP/HTTPS POST request.Affected if The endpoint /en/9-2radius.php responds to requests, indicating the vulnerable script is present.
-
Inspect RADIUS configuration stateExamine the RADIUS configuration to determine if enable_radius is set to 1. This may be done by reviewing saved configuration files, checking the web interface RADIUS settings page, or inspecting the underlying configuration storage.Affected if RADIUS feature is enabled (enable_radius=1) in the configuration.
-
Identify exposed management interfaceDetermine if the management interface is exposed to untrusted networks by reviewing network firewall rules, access control lists, or listening services on the host.Affected if The management interface (port 80/443 or custom) is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.
Users are affected if they have Synway SMG Gateway Management Software with the RADIUS feature enabled (enable_radius=1) and the management interface is accessible, since all versions contain the command injection vulnerability in the /en/9-2radius.php endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches immediately when available; meanwhile, restrict network access to the management interface to trusted IPs only and consider disabling the RADIUS feature if not required, as exploitation is trivial and achieves unauthenticated RCE.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-71284 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-71284 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data