CVE-2025-71317
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNetMan 204 contains a hard-coded backdoor account with the username and password 'eurek' that grants administrative access. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can authenticate through the cgi-bin/login.cgi endpoint (for example /cgi-bin/login.cgi?username=eurek&password=eurek, which due to lax parameter validation can be shortened to /cgi-bin/login.cgi?username=eurek%20eurek) to obtain administrator privileges, allowing them to alter device configuration, enable the telnet/SSH services, and reset local user credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNetMan 204 network management device contains a hard-coded backdoor account (eurek/eurek) that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to obtain full administrative privileges via the cgi-bin/login.cgi endpoint. The vulnerability exploits lax parameter validation where the username parameter accepts 'eurek%20eurek' as valid credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetMan 204 device on the networkAccess the device web interface or check network inventory for model number 'NetMan 204' or check the device's about/page for firmware version informationAffected if Device model is NetMan 204 and is reachable on the network
-
Verify cgi-bin/login.cgi endpoint is accessibleAttempt an HTTP GET or POST request to http://[device-ip]/cgi-bin/login.cgi - check if the endpoint respondsAffected if The login.cgi endpoint returns a valid HTTP response (200 or 401) indicating it is exposed
-
Test authentication with backdoor credentialsSend a POST request to cgi-bin/login.cgi with parameters username=eurek%20eurek and password=eurek (URL-encoded as username=eurek%20eurek&password=eurek)Affected if Authentication succeeds and returns a session token or administrative access
-
Check for hardcoded eurek account existenceReview any accessible device configuration files, user lists, or authentication logs for the username 'eurek'Affected if The account 'eurek' exists in the device user database without being explicitly created by an administrator
If the device is a NetMan 204 with an accessible cgi-bin/login.cgi endpoint that accepts the backdoor credentials (eurek%20eurek/eurek), the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately restrict network access to the device's cgi-bin interface via firewall or ACLs; contact vendor for firmware patch to remove hardcoded credentials; if no patch available, consider network isolation or device replacement.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-71317 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-71317 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data