Deserialization of Untrusted DataWeakness · CWE-502

CVE-2025-71358

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
88/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
picklescan before 0.0.29 fails to detect malicious pickle files that exploit idlelib.autocomplete.AutoComplete.get_entity function in reduce methods. Attackers can embed undetected code in pickle files that executes arbitrary commands when loaded by victims using pickle.load().

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

picklescan before 0.0.29 fails to detect malicious pickle files that exploit the idlelib.autocomplete.AutoComplete.get_entity function in reduce methods. Attackers can craft pickle files using this specific technique to bypass the scanner's signature-based detection and achieve arbitrary code execution when victims unpickle the files with pickle.load().

MitigationUpgrade picklescan to version 0.0.29 or later to receive the updated detection signatures. Additionally, avoid unpickling untrusted data entirely - use safer serialization formats like JSON or implement restricted custom unpicklers.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed picklescan version
    Run 'pip show picklescan' or 'pip list | grep picklescan' to see the currently installed version number
    Affected if The displayed version is earlier than 0.0.29 (for example, 0.0.28, 0.0.27, etc.)
  2. Determine if picklescan scans untrusted pickle files
    Review your codebase or workflow to see if picklescan is used to validate pickle files from external or untrusted sources
    Affected if Picklescan is actively used to inspect pickle files that originate from users, downloads, network inputs, or other untrusted sources
  3. Verify pickle.load usage with untrusted data
    Search your codebase for 'pickle.load' calls and check if any handle data from users, APIs, files received from external parties, or network sources
    Affected if Your application unpickles data that could be crafted by an attacker (untrusted input) and relies on picklescan as a security checkpoint
  4. Check for idlelib-based pickle patterns in your data flow
    Inspect any pickled files you process to see if they contain references to 'idlelib.autocomplete' or 'AutoComplete.get_entity' in reduce methods - use 'pickletools' or hexdump to examine pickle bytecode
    Affected if The pickle files being scanned contain the specific idlelib.autocomplete.AutoComplete.get_entity exploitation technique
  5. Confirm signature-based detection reliance
    Review your security process to verify that picklescan's detection is a primary or sole control for blocking malicious pickle files
    Affected if Your defense against malicious pickles relies primarily or entirely on picklescan's signature-based scanning without additional safeguards

You are affected if picklescan version is below 0.0.29 AND you use it to scan pickle files from untrusted sources, since the scanner can be bypassed by the idlelib.autocomplete.AutoComplete.get_entity reduce method technique.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade picklescan to version 0.0.29 or later to receive the updated detection signatures. Additionally, avoid unpickling untrusted data entirely - use safer serialization formats like JSON or implement restricted custom unpicklers.

Recommended fix High confidence

picklescan 0.0.29

  1. Check the current installed version of picklescan by running: pip show picklescan or picklescan --version
  2. Upgrade picklescan to version 0.0.29 or later using: pip install --upgrade picklescan
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version again

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-71358 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-71358 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data