CVE-2025-7193
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Agri-Trading Online Shopping System up to 1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/suppliercontroller.php. The manipulation of the argument supplier leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the supplier parameter of /admin/suppliercontroller.php in itsourcecode Agri-Trading Online Shopping System up to version 1.0 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries via the supplier argument.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the Agri-Trading Online Shopping System is deployedIdentify the web application by accessing the homepage and checking for product-specific identifiers, or enumerate web directories for /admin/suppliercontroller.phpAffected if The application is itsourcecode Agri-Trading Online Shopping System or Adonesevangelista Agri Trading Online Shopping System
-
Determine the installed versionCheck for a version indicator in the application footer, changelog file, or meta tags within the HTML source. If no version is displayed, compare any identifiable files against the 1.0 releaseAffected if The version is 1.0 or earlier (the vulnerability affects up to and including version 1.0)
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsCheck if /admin/suppliercontroller.php is present on the web server via direct HTTP request or directory enumerationAffected if The file /admin/suppliercontroller.php exists and is accessible
-
Confirm the supplier parameter is functionalAccess the supplier controller endpoint and verify the supplier parameter is accepted and processed. This can be done by making a request to the affected script with a test value in the supplier parameterAffected if The supplier parameter is accepted and the page processes input without immediate error or proper sanitization indication
If the itsourcecode Agri-Trading Online Shopping System version 1.0 or earlier is running and the /admin/suppliercontroller.php with supplier parameter is accessible, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements, implement strict input validation on the supplier parameter, and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7193 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7193 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data