CVE-2025-7204
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn ConnectWise PSA versions older than 2025.9, a vulnerability exists where authenticated users could gain access to sensitive user information. Specific API requests were found to return an overly verbose user object, which included encrypted password hashes for other users. Authenticated users could then retrieve these hashes. An attacker or privileged user could then use these exposed hashes to conduct offline brute-force or dictionary attacks. Such attacks could lead to credential compromise, allowing unauthorized access to accounts, and potentially privilege escalation within the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceConnectWise PSA versions before 2025.9 contain an information disclosure vulnerability where authenticated API requests return overly verbose user objects that include encrypted password hashes for other users. Authenticated attackers can retrieve these hashes and conduct offline brute-force or dictionary attacks to compromise credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ConnectWise PSA versionLocate the installed ConnectWise PSA version in the system administration panel or product information screen. This is typically found under Help > About or in the version information displayed on the login page.Affected if The installed version is any release before 2025.9 (e.g., 2025.8, 2025.7, earlier major versions).
-
Verify API access is enabledCheck if the REST API feature is enabled in ConnectWise PSA. Navigate to System > Setup > Integrations or the API configuration section, and confirm whether API access is permitted for authenticated users.Affected if API access is enabled and available to authenticated users, allowing them to make API requests.
-
Inspect user object API responsesUsing an authenticated API client (such as Postman or curl with valid credentials), query the user endpoints (e.g., GET /api/v3_2/users or /api/v3_2/contacts). Examine the JSON response body for user records.Affected if The API responses return user objects containing password hash fields (look for fields named passwordHash, encryptedPassword, pwdHash, or similar variations).
-
Confirm hash presence in other-user responsesAfter authenticating as a standard user (non-admin), query the user API endpoint to retrieve the full list of user objects. Verify whether the response includes encrypted password hashes for users other than the currently authenticated user.Affected if Password hashes for other users are visible in API responses obtained with your own authenticated session.
Your environment is affected if ConnectWise PSA version is below 2025.9 and the API returns encrypted password hashes for users in the response objects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025.9
Upgrade to ConnectWise PSA version 2025.9 or later, and audit API response schemas to ensure password hashes and other sensitive fields are excluded from user object responses.
2025.9
- 1. Identify the current ConnectWise PSA version by accessing the system admin panel or checking the software documentation
- 2. Review the ConnectWise PSA 2025.9 release notes to confirm the security fixes address the information exposure vulnerability
- 3. Create a complete backup of the current ConnectWise PSA database and configuration
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 5. If available, test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment first
- 6. Upgrade ConnectWise PSA to version 2025.9 or later following the official upgrade documentation
- 7. After upgrade, verify the fix by making API requests that previously returned verbose user objects and confirm password hashes are no longer exposed
- 8. Monitor system logs for any unusual activity following the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7204 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data