CVE-2025-7330
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site request forgery security issue exists in the product and version listed. The vulnerability stems from missing CSRF checks on the impacted form. This allows for unintended configuration modification if an attacker can convince a logged in admin to visit a crafted link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a CSRF vulnerability caused by missing anti-CSRF token validation on a form endpoint. An unauthenticated attacker can trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a request that modifies the application's configuration, such as changing settings or enabling/disabling features.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.007CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the 1783 NATR device on the networkLocate the Rockwell Automation 1783 NATR device by reviewing network inventory, device discovery logs, or physical asset records. Note the device's IP address for web interface access.Affected if The target system is a Rockwell Automation 1783 NATR device with a web-based management interface accessible to administrators.
-
Check the firmware versionAccess the device's web management interface and navigate to the firmware or system information section. Compare the installed firmware version against version 1.007.Affected if The installed firmware version is below 1.007 (for example, 1.006, 1.005, etc.).
-
Verify web interface is enabled for configurationConfirm that the device's web interface is enabled and accessible. Log in as an administrator and navigate to configuration or settings pages where state-changing actions can be performed (such as changing network settings, enabling/disabling features, or modifying device behavior).Affected if The web management interface is enabled and allows authenticated administrators to modify configuration settings.
-
Inspect configuration forms for anti-CSRF tokensUse a browser's developer tools or an HTTP proxy to intercept HTTP requests when submitting configuration forms on the device. Examine the request headers and body for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens, synchronizer tokens, or unique request validation parameters.Affected if Configuration change requests do not contain anti-CSRF tokens or unique request validation parameters in the request body, headers, or cookies.
The environment is affected if the device is a Rockwell Automation 1783 NATR running firmware version below 1.007 with its web interface enabled and configuration forms lack anti-CSRF token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.007
Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing form submissions and validate these tokens server-side before processing any configuration changes.
1783 Natr Firmware version 1.007 or later
- Identify the current firmware version of the 1783 Natr device
- Navigate to the official Rockwell Automation website and locate the 1783 Natr firmware download page
- Download the fixed firmware version 1.007 or later from the official source
- Review the official firmware upgrade instructions provided by Rockwell Automation
- Following the official procedure, upload and install the new firmware to the device
- After upgrade, verify the device is functioning correctly and confirm the new firmware version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7330 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7330 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data