SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-7343

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The SFT developed by Digiwin has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The SFT developed by Digiwin contains an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands, enabling complete compromise of the database including unauthorized read, write, and delete operations.

MitigationImmediately restrict network exposure of the affected SFT component and implement parameterized queries/prepared statements to remediate the SQL injection; apply vendor patches when available and conduct a full database integrity audit.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Digiwin SFT installation
    Search for Digiwin SFT executables, services, or installation directories on the system. Common locations include C:\Program Files\Digiwin or installation directories under web server document roots if web-based.
    Affected if Digiwin SFT software is found installed on the system
  2. Determine SFT version
    Check the installed version through the application itself (typically accessible via Help > About or similar), check version info on the main executable, or review installation logs and registry entries for version metadata.
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within the affected version range provided by Digiwin for this CVE
  3. Verify network exposure
    Check firewall rules, network configurations, and IIS/Apache/nginx bindings to determine if the SFT component is accessible from network addresses outside localhost. Use netstat or equivalent to identify listening ports associated with the SFT service.
    Affected if The SFT component listens on a network-accessible IP/port and is not restricted to localhost only
  4. Identify accessible SQL injection entry points
    Review web application URLs, API endpoints, or application forms that accept user input and interact with the database. Focus on login, search, and data retrieval functionalities that may pass input directly to SQL queries.
    Affected if User-facing input fields or API parameters that lack parameterized query implementation are present and accessible over the network
  5. Test for SQL injection vulnerability
    Using a safe, read-only SQL injection test string (such as a single quote or SQL-safe boolean-based test) on suspected input parameters, observe application error responses or unexpected behavior indicating unsanitized input is passed to database queries.
    Affected if The application returns database errors, exposes SQL syntax in responses, or exhibits unexpected behavior when special SQL characters are submitted in input fields

A system is affected if Digiwin SFT is installed, the installed version is within the vulnerable range, and the component is network-accessible with user input fields that could allow SQL injection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Immediately restrict network exposure of the affected SFT component and implement parameterized queries/prepared statements to remediate the SQL injection; apply vendor patches when available and conduct a full database integrity audit.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7343 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7343 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data