InjectionWeakness · CWE-74

CVE-2025-7350

HIGH · 8.6 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-09-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security issue affecting multiple Cisco devices also directly impacts Stratix® 5410, 5700, and 8000 devices. This can lead to remote code execution by uploading and running malicious configurations without authentication.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability in Rockwell Automation Stratix 5410, 5700, and 8000 industrial Ethernet switches, stemming from inherited Cisco technology, allows unauthenticated attackers to upload and execute malicious configurations.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches or firmware updates when released; until then, restrict network access to management interfaces and monitor for unauthorized configuration upload attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
A
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Stratix switch model
    Access the switch CLI or web interface and run 'show version' or check the device info page to confirm the exact model number (5410, 5700, or 8000)
    Affected if Model is Stratix 5410, 5700, or 8000 - these are the affected product lines
  2. Determine firmware version
    Run 'show version' in the switch CLI or check the firmware version in the web interface. Compare the displayed firmware version against any Rockwell Automation advisories for this CVE.
    Affected if Firmware version is unpatched per the vendor's CVE-2025-7350 advisory (version comparison required against vendor-published affected versions)
  3. Check management interface exposure
    Verify if the switch management interface (HTTP/HTTPS, SSH, Telnet) is accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, VLAN configuration, or using 'show ip interface' to list accessible IPs
    Affected if Management interface is reachable from outside the trusted management network (pre-authentication flaw means any network access is risky)
  4. Audit configuration upload logs
    Review switch logs for any unexpected configuration upload events. Use 'show logging' or check syslog exports for entries containing 'configure replace', 'copy running-config', or configuration restore activities.
    Affected if Unexpected configuration uploads or restores appear in logs, especially from unfamiliar sources
  5. Inspect for unauthorized configuration changes
    Compare the current running configuration against known-good baselines using 'show running-config' versus previously saved configuration files, checking for unfamiliar commands or injected code.
    Affected if Running configuration contains unexpected commands, scripts, or modifications not authored by legitimate administrators

A defender is affected if they operate an unpatched Stratix 5410, 5700, or 8000 switch with management interfaces accessible to untrusted networks, regardless of whether exploitation has occurred.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches or firmware updates when released; until then, restrict network access to management interfaces and monitor for unauthorized configuration upload attempts.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7350 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7350 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data