CVE-2025-7359
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Counter live visitors for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the wcvisitor_get_block function in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server. NOTE: This particular vulnerability deletes all the files in a targeted arbitrary directory rather than a specified arbitrary file, which can lead to loss of data or a denial of service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Counter live visitors for WooCommerce WordPress plugin versions up to 1.3.6 lack proper file path validation in the wcvisitor_get_block function, allowing unauthenticated attackers to delete all files within arbitrary server directories. This results from insufficient input sanitization enabling path traversal-like behavior.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installationCheck if the 'counter-live-visitors-for-woocommerce' plugin exists in the WordPress plugins directory at wp-content/plugins/. Look for a folder named 'counter-live-visitors-for-woocommerce' or similar.Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation.
-
Identify installed versionOpen the main plugin file (usually counter-live-visitors-for-woocommerce.php or index.php inside the plugin folder) and locate the version comment or the 'Version:' header in the plugin metadata. Compare this version number to the affected range: versions up to and including 1.3.6 are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is 1.3.6 or lower.
-
Verify vulnerable function accessibilityCheck if the wcvisitor_get_block function is registered as an AJAX handler accessible to unauthenticated users. Look in the plugin code for add_action('wp_ajax_wcvisitor_get_block', ...) or add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_wcvisitor_get_block', ...). The presence of 'wp_ajax_nopriv_' indicates unauthenticated access is possible.Affected if The function is hooked to wp_ajax_nopriv_wcvisitor_get_block, allowing unauthenticated access.
-
Review access controls on the affected endpointExamine the wcvisitor_get_block function implementation to confirm it lacks capability checks (like current_user_can) or nonce validation. Search the function code for 'current_user_can' or 'wp_verify_nonce'.Affected if No capability checks or nonce validation exist in the wcvisitor_get_block function.
-
Inspect server logs for deletion attemptsSearch WordPress debug logs, Apache/nginx access logs, or server error logs for requests containing 'wcvisitor_get_block' combined with path traversal patterns (such as '../' or absolute paths in the request parameters).Affected if Log entries show requests to wcvisitor_get_block with directory traversal patterns or unusual file deletion activity.
A user is affected if the Counter live visitors for WooCommerce plugin version 1.3.6 or lower is installed and the wcvisitor_get_block function is accessible to unauthenticated users without proper validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to the latest version immediately. If no patch is available, consider removing the plugin or disabling the affected function via .htaccess or firewall rules until a fix is released. Assess logs for any suspicious deletion activity.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7359 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7359 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data