CVE-2025-7361
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA code injection vulnerability due to an improper initialization check exists in NI LabVIEW that may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI using a CIN node. This vulnerability affects 32-bit NI LabVIEW 2025 Q1 and prior versions. LabVIEW 64-bit versions do not support CIN nodes and are not affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA code injection vulnerability exists in 32-bit NI LabVIEW versions 2025 Q1 and prior due to an improper initialization check in the CIN (Code Interface Node) functionality. An attacker can craft a malicious VI file that, when opened by a user, allows arbitrary code execution through the CIN node. The vulnerability does not affect 64-bit LabVIEW versions as they do not support CIN nodes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2021= 2022= 2023= 2024= 2025CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify LabVIEW installation architectureCheck if the installed LabVIEW is 32-bit or 64-bit. Look for 'LabVIEW 32-bit' or 'LabVIEW (32-bit)' in the Start Menu, or check the program files directory (Program Files (x86)\National Instruments\ for 32-bit vs Program Files\National Instruments\ for 64-bit).Affected if The installation is 32-bit LabVIEW. The vulnerability does NOT affect 64-bit LabVIEW as CIN nodes are not supported.
-
Determine LabVIEW version numberOpen LabVIEW and go to Help > About LabVIEW, or check the version in the installation directory or NI MAX software. Compare the version year (2022, 2023, 2024, 2025) and any Q1 designation against the affected range.Affected if The installed version is 2025 Q1 or prior, or any version listed as 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, or 2025.
-
Locate CIN nodes in projectsSearch project files (.lvproj) and VI files (.vi) for 'CIN' or 'Code Interface Node' references. In LabVIEW, open the Functions palette and check if CIN nodes are available under the Connectivity or Hardware Input/Output categories.Affected if CIN nodes exist in any project or the CIN palette is accessible in the 32-bit LabVIEW environment.
-
Inspect VI files from external sourcesIf VI files from untrusted sources are present, examine them using the LabVIEW VI Analyzer or by reviewing the block diagram for CIN nodes that may execute external code.Affected if A VI file contains a CIN node configured to call external code, which could be exploited by a maliciously crafted VI.
A user is affected if they have 32-bit LabVIEW version 2025 Q1 or earlier installed AND have access to or use CIN nodes in their LabVIEW environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to a patched version of LabVIEW when released by NI, and exercise caution when opening VI files from untrusted sources. Consider migrating to 64-bit LabVIEW if CIN node functionality is not required, as this variant is not affected.
NI LabVIEW 64-bit (any current version) or LabVIEW 2025 Q3+ (32-bit)
- 1. Identify whether you are running 32-bit or 64-bit LabVIEW by opening LabVIEW and checking Help > About LabVIEW
- 2. If running 32-bit LabVIEW, consider migrating to 64-bit LabVIEW which does not support CIN nodes and is not affected by this vulnerability
- 3. If 64-bit migration is not feasible, upgrade to the latest 32-bit LabVIEW version available from NI (currently LabVIEW 2025 Q3 or later)
- 4. After upgrading, verify all existing VIs function correctly, particularly any that previously used CIN nodes
- 5. Implement user training to never open VIs from untrusted sources, as exploitation requires user interaction to open a specially crafted VI
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7361 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7361 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data