CVE-2025-7386
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInformation exposure vulnerability in Hitachi Storage Navigator. This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5200, 5500, 5600, 5100H, 5200H, 5500H, 5600H, VX8: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-09-24-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-09-24/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-86-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-86/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500, F1500, VX7: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-96-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-91/00.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInformation exposure vulnerability in Hitachi Storage Navigator affecting multiple Virtual Storage Platform models (5100, 5200, 5500, 5600, G1000, G1500, F1500, and VX7/8 variants). The vulnerability allows unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information due to missing or insufficient security controls in the Storage Navigator component before specified version thresholds.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Virtual Storage Platform modelAccess the Storage Navigator interface or check system documentation to determine if the deployed model is one of: 5100, 5200, 5500, 5600, G1000, G1500, F1500, or VX7/8 variantsAffected if The model is any of the listed VSP models (5100, 5200, 5500, 5600, G1000, G1500, F1500, VX7/8)
-
Verify Storage Navigator component is in useConfirm that the Storage Navigator management component is deployed and accessible on the storage system. Storage Navigator is the GUI/CLI tool used to manage Hitachi VSP arraysAffected if Storage Navigator is used to manage the VSP array
-
Check DKCMAIN firmware version for 5x00H seriesAccess the storage system maintenance terminal or Storage Navigator and retrieve the DKCMAIN firmware version. For 5x00H series models, compare the version against: 90-09-24-00/00 or 90-08-86-00/00Affected if DKCMAIN version is earlier than 90-09-24-00/00 or 90-08-86-00/00 on 5x00H series models
-
Check DKCMAIN firmware version for G1000/G1500/F1500/VX7Access the storage system maintenance terminal or Storage Navigator and retrieve the DKCMAIN firmware version. For G1000/G1500/F1500/VX7 models, compare against: 80-06-96-00/00Affected if DKCMAIN version is earlier than 80-06-96-00/00 on G1000/G1500/F1500/VX7 models
-
Check SVP software versionLocate the Service Processor (SVP) software version through Storage Navigator system information or SVP management interface. Note: The SVP version should be checked in conjunction with DKCMAIN firmware versionsAffected if SVP software version is not at the recommended level corresponding to the patched DKCMAIN firmware
A system is affected if it uses Storage Navigator to manage any of the listed VSP models and has DKCMAIN firmware version below the specified thresholds for its model family.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade DKCMAIN firmware and SVP (Service Processor) software to the versions specified (DKCMAIN Ver. 90-09-24-00/00 or 90-08-86-00/00 for 5x00H series; DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-96-00/00 for G1000/G1500/F1500/VX7) to remediate the information exposure.
DKCMAIN Ver. 90-09-24-00/00 / SVP Ver. 90-09-24/00 for VSP 5100/5200/5500/5600 series; DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-96-00/00 / SVP Ver. 80-06-91/00 for VSP G1000/G1500/F1500/VX7
- Identify your specific Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform model (VSP 5100, 5200, 5500, 5600, 5100H, 5200H, 5500H, 5600H, VX8, G1000, G1500, F1500, or VX7)
- Check the current DKCMAIN and SVP firmware versions currently installed on your system
- For VSP 5100/5200/5500/5600/5100H/5200H/5500H/5600H/VX8: Upgrade to DKCMAIN Ver. 90-09-24-00/00 or later and SVP Ver. 90-09-24/00 or later
- For VSP G1000/G1500/F1500/VX7: Upgrade to DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-96-00/00 or later and SVP Ver. 80-06-91/00 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the firmware versions post-installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7386 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7386 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data