CVE-2025-7427
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled Search Path Element in Arm Development Studio before 2025 may allow an attacker to perform a DLL hijacking attack. Successful exploitation could lead to local arbitrary code execution in the context of the user running Arm Development Studio.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceArm Development Studio before version 2025 contains an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability allowing DLL hijacking. The application loads dynamic link libraries without fully qualifying paths, enabling an attacker to place a malicious DLL in a directory searched by the application. Successful exploitation allows local arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running the software.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Arm Development Studio versionLocate the Arm Development Studio installation directory (commonly in C:\Program Files\Arm\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Arm\) and check for version information in the product documentation, about dialog, or installer metadata. The version is typically displayed as a year-based release (e.g., 2024.x).Affected if The installed version is earlier than 2025.0 (e.g., 2024.1, 2024.0, or earlier releases).
-
Compare version against affected rangeIf version information is found, compare it to the affected range: any version before 2025.0 is vulnerable. Versions starting with 2025.0 or later are not affected.Affected if The installed version is < 2025.0 according to the CVE affected products list.
-
Examine system PATH for suspicious directoriesReview the system and user PATH environment variables for any untrusted or writable directories that precede system directories (such as C:\Windows\System32). Use 'echo %PATH%' in Command Prompt or check System Properties > Environment Variables.Affected if The PATH contains user-writable directories (e.g., temp folders, download directories) placed before system directories, increasing DLL hijacking risk.
-
Verify application execution contextWhen Arm Development Studio is launched, observe which directories are searched for DLLs by monitoring process creation or checking the application's working directory. Ensure the working directory is a trusted location.Affected if The application is launched from or operates in a directory writable by untrusted users, or the working directory contains untrusted DLLs.
A user is affected if Arm Development Studio version is installed and is earlier than 2025.0, and the PATH or working directory contains untrusted locations that could be exploited for DLL hijacking.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025.0
Upgrade to Arm Development Studio 2025 or later, which addresses the uncontrolled search path element. Alternatively, ensure the application runs from trusted directories and remove any untrusted locations from the system PATH that precede system directories.
2025.0
- Check the current installed version of Arm Development Studio
- Download Arm Development Studio version 2025.0 or later from the official ARM developer website (developer.arm.com)
- Install the new version following Arm's standard installation procedures
- Verify the installation completed successfully and the new version is running
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7427 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7427 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data