CVE-2025-7469
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Campcodes Sales and Inventory System 1.0 and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /pages/product_add.php. The manipulation of the argument prod_name leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the prod_name parameter of /pages/product_add.php in Campcodes Sales and Inventory System 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unsanitized user input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm product versionLocate the application version identifier in the source code, admin panel, or documentation files (check for version strings like '1.0' in footer, about page, or version config files). Compare against the affected version: 1.0.Affected if The installed version is Campcodes Sales and Inventory System 1.0
-
Verify vulnerable file existsCheck if the file /pages/product_add.php exists in the web application directory structure.Affected if The file /pages/product_add.php is present in the application
-
Inspect SQL query handling for prod_nameOpen /pages/product_add.php and locate the code handling the prod_name parameter. Search for SQL queries (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE) that incorporate the prod_name variable directly without using prepared statements or parameter binding.Affected if The prod_name parameter is used in dynamic SQL queries without parameterized binding (e.g., no $stmt->prepare() or similar placeholder usage)
-
Check for input sanitization functionsIn the same file, look for sanitization functions applied to prod_name before database use, such as mysqli_real_escape_string, htmlspecialchars, or input validation routines.Affected if No sanitization function is called on prod_name before its use in SQL queries, or the sanitization is incomplete
The system is affected if it runs Campcodes Sales and Inventory System version 1.0 and the /pages/product_add.php file contains unsanitized dynamic SQL construction using the prod_name parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL construction with parameterized queries or prepared statements for the prod_name parameter, then verify the fix prevents injection while maintaining normal product creation functionality.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7469 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7469 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data